The table below shows the results of a 20-year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table represents the outcomes of a 20 year survey of adults and their reasons to participate in arts events in their country UK. This report will evaluate the data given.
Overall, the need to see specific performer or celebrity was the main reason behind the attraction of many people in these events. The least reason was attending arts competition for business related works.
The percentage of people who attended the arts to see their specific artist had only fluctuated from 58% to 56% throughout the 20 year period. However, people who accompanied their children in these events increased from 9% to 24% being the second major reason for participating in arts events.
In terms of work/business reasons, only 6% of the people attended the events with this reason 20 years ago which later rised to high of 11%. Surprisingly, for the people who attended arts events to celebrate special occasions declined from 27% to 9% through the 20 year period.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 78
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island according to a survey of visitors 87
- Water pollution is an extreme problem on a global scale which people are having to cope with on an increasingly regular basis What are some main causes and solutions for this issue 74
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people believe that family has a greater influence on a child’s life and development than other factors like friends, TV, music and so on.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01863354037 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64486898924 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3831605966 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179811812989 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862529066416 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041039587647 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119625951725 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355581536018 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.