Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals can be characterized as the unethical or illegitimate behavior that instigates public outrage. they have been prevalent in the world since time immemorial. I think it's one of the important matter of concern as various nefarious acts happening in the society are brought into light for general public. So, I am in congruent with the statement that it does focus our attention to details taht might otherwise be hidden and unprosecuted.
It would not be unwise to say that we live in world of gray -that is we have people of both qualities of good and bad. So the things like scandal does really evince out the bad of the world. Scandals are quite capable of causing foment and outrage among people in a way that no speaker or reformer would be able to. To make it apparent, let's take an example of "Me Too" event in which sexual crimes happening to people of local and international figures came out. This took a massive appearance in social sites in 2017 causing all women, who were sexually assaulted, to come out. This became contagious to many countries, starting from US then, to Russia, India and so forth. This was the first time that people all around the world gave their deepest vehement criticism and imprecation which led to firing and defamation of lots of high profile people.
In addition, scandals affects people of large section which makes it imperative to take the matter seriously for the government to quench their citizens' anger. Not only does scandals like this increases the focus among people but also, it forces the authorities to take appropriate action fast. Reformers and speakers on the other hand, may bring solutions to problems but such solutions might not always be ion the favor of nation as it could be influenced by various factors such as power, money, greed and so forth. But scandals when it surfaces, the authorities are forced to do it right. to exemplify, lets take a scandal which surfaced recently about President of US, Donald Trump, about his mishaps on withholding the federal aid of Ukraine to get the information about his political rival for next election,Joe Biden. A man of such power could have gotten away with it, if that scandal had not surfaced. It caused altercation among many people against the President and invoke a legal inquisition against him and should he be found guilty, he will be acquitted of his power and probably be jailed. So, i think we can safely say scandals are powerful tools to illuminate general population of what's wrong.
Scandals play a vital role in addressing the issues of which might have been overlooked by the people and the government. However, some might argue that scandals has grown so popular that people are searching for scandals to get recognition or fame, in the run they are creating fake news and scandals which casts opprobrium on the innocent, so scandals cannot be trusted. It is inarguably true which is why people should only believe in facts supported by definitive proof. Without proof, nobody should be blaming anyone which can mar someone's reputation which cannot be rebuild. But due to some fake scandals, it is not wise to refute scandals altogether.
In my opinion, scandals are very sensitive matters that requires a sensitive way of dealing with it. They are balancing the good and bad by bringing about mishaps and crimes happening around us and incites empathy among us and we should deal with it as a rational human being. They are very powerful tools in many ways that outstrips speaker and reformers in many ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ehavior that instigates public outrage. they have been prevalent in the world since ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nefarious acts happening in the society are brought into light for general publi...
^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...the society are brought into light for general public. So, I am in congruent with the stateme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...US then, to Russia, India and so forth. This was the first time that people all arou...
^^^^
Line 9, column 595, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... authorities are forced to do it right. to exemplify, lets take a scandal which su...
^^
Line 9, column 816, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Joe
...ut his political rival for next election,Joe Biden. A man of such power could have g...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1112, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...f his power and probably be jailed. So, i think we can safely say scandals are p...
^
Line 9, column 1119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ower and probably be jailed. So, i think we can safely say scandals are powerful ...
^^
Line 9, column 1203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ols to illuminate general population of whats wrong. Scandals play a vital role...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, really, so, then, i think, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2969.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 607.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89126853377 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96360453597 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58329165509 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523887973641 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 919.8 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7470418777 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.962962963 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4814814815 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 5.13820224719 370% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184455654339 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500962907048 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535694871477 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103006287384 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244196485121 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.