the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The bar chart compares the proportion of males and females doing physical activity in different age groups in Australia in the year 2010.
Overall, it is clear that within 6 age groups women were significantly more active than men. In addition, middle-aged women participated in physical activity most frequently, while men aged from 35 to 44 were least active.
Looking at the information in more detail, the proportions of both elderly men and women who did physical exercises on a regular basis were nearly equal, at 46.7% and 47.1% respectively. Interestingly, only in the youngest age group the percentage of men was higher than that of women, by approximately 5%.
Females who are from 35 to 44 did physical exercises most frequently. By contrast, the number of men in the same age group was at its lowest point, at only 39.5%. While nearly a half of females from 25 to 34 years old taking part in physical activity, the figure for men was only over 40%. Similarly, the percentage of women over 54 to 64 years old who did regular exercises was 10% higher than that of men.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 67 | view |
2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 11 | view |
2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 67 | view |
2020-01-09 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. SOme people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others believe that the problem can be solved by providing computers and 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77127659574 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76914709705 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4858384785 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418239900604 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182966149814 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761814712617 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272300418804 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419397482746 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.