The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants.
The pie chat reveals information about different usage of energy in australian homes, and the given table provides data about amount of electricity use per year by different number of people in the house.
Overall, in australian household the common function of energy is for heating and cooling while stand by power and cooking usage don't consume a significant amount of energy, furthermore it is obvious that with high number of people in house amount of electricity usage would increase in contrast individual person in home.
In typical australian home, 38% of total energy is used for cooling in sweaty month's of year and heating in freezing seasons. However second popular usage of energies are for increase water temperature by using 25% resources. Moreover average consumed energy for lights and refrigerators are 7%. Small part of energy in household is being used for cooking foods and standby power with just 4% and 3% respectively. Remained amount of resources is consumed by other appliances. In house which includes 6 or more individual persons total electricity which used in those home is higher than other type of houses by using between 12000 to 16000 kilowatt per hour just in a year. In other hand in houses which just one person lives number of electricity is about 5000 to 6500 ish which is lower than homes with 2 or 3 people.
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now , and plans for it's development. 78
- Te graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across faculties of a major university in 2012 78
- The chart below show how frequently people in USA ate in fastfood restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The graph below shows the proprotion of our differnt materials that were recycled from 1982 t0 2010 in a particular country. 56
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... household the common function of energy is for heating and cooling while stand b...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... while stand by power and cooking usage dont consume a significant amount of energy,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ter temperature by using 25% resources. Moreover average consumed energy for lights and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 641, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilowatt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilowatts'.
Suggestion: kilowatts
... houses by using between 12000 to 16000 kilowatt per hour just in a year. In other hand ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 774, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of electricity is about 5000 to 6500 ish which is lower than homes with 2 or 3 pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97807017544 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62264565601 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3577547646 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.111111111 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263096970618 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111878142114 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581343244982 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189042579983 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376916053645 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.