In the last year’s mayoral election in Town T, candidate Miller led candidate Keating by a substantial margin in the polls leading up to the election. At the last minute, candidate Keating launched a widely viewed series of television advertisements that focused on preserving the natural environment of Town T, a topic neglected by candidate Miller. Subsequently, candidate Keating won the election by a narrow margin. This year, if candidate Miller hopes to win the upcoming mayoral election, he must increase his coverage of the topic of preserving the natural environment of Town T.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The author states that in the last year mayoral election candidate miller was defeated by keating although he pioneered in the polls leading up to the election. Since keating launched a series of tv advertisement that concentrated on preserving the natural environment of town T, miller should focus more on this topic to win the election. while the argument seems completely reasonable at first glance, further considerations and pursuing situations reveal some apparent flaws.
The author fails to indicate the name of the polls holders and the extent to which they are valid. When he claims that miller led keating by a substantial margin, he should glean more pieces of evidence about this notion. If these polls are manipulated are lacks in data gathering and surveying principles, the results should not be highlighted, and any further conclusion based on them is incorrect.
Also, the author assumes that tv advertisements play a crucial role in the fate of the election. there are no more data and information about the role of each action in the popularity of the candidates. The marketing team should present more before/after data about every campaign and advertisement to investigate and assess their effectiveness. while there is no clear evidence about this issue, the author’s claim flaws and not plausible.
Moreover, he states that the last-minute decision to launch widely viewed advertisements about the natural environment of town T led changes the results of the poll and led to keating victory. he does not provide precise data to declare that the ads was the only factor for the remarkable rise in keating votes. there might be other campaigns that have been planned to result in the last days remained to the election time such as broadcasting news, public presentations, several gatherings, etc., and they just coincided with the ads launching. The issue that the increase in the votes was only up to the ads should be better defended and more evidence provided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-03 | Thelmacakes | 68 | view |
| 2022-02-19 | SP30 | 77 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | shubhamaggarwal | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | farhadmoqimi | 27 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | kunalnate | 73 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 58
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- OG1 - meerkat altruistic actions 81
- TPO 5 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO 50 - 3
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 326 350
No. of Characters: 1632 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.249 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.763 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.392 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.395 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.646 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.124 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...more on this topic to win the election. while the argument seems completely reasonabl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ucial role in the fate of the election. there are no more data and information about ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...stigate and assess their effectiveness. while there is no clear evidence about this i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...of the poll and led to keating victory. he does not provide precise data to declar...
^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...r the remarkable rise in keating votes. there might be other campaigns that have been...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89990818055 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544615384615 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1548024932 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.785714286 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295308614517 0.218282227539 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899940712346 0.0743258471296 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114760606127 0.0701772020484 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16969047064 0.128457276422 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120417996869 0.0628817314937 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.