The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000.
The presented line graph demonstrates data about how many parcels transported by two top mail office corporations, namely FedEx and TNT over the period of 80 years, starting from 1920 to 2000.
The most striking feature to be observed is that, whilst FedEx accounted for the highest amount of parcels in terms of the delivering at the beginning of period, it was replaced by TNT towards the end of the survey.
Looking at the data in more details, it is clear that in 1920, number of parcels which delivered by FedEx was about three-fold higher compared to TNT, 15000 and 5000 parcels, respectively. After that, FedEx figure witnessed a slight increase and hit the highest point just below 25000 in 1940. In the following decade, the figure plunged tremendously to around 12500. From 1950 to 1960, while FedEx figure remained relatively stable across 12500, the latter saw a substantial growth so approached to the number of parcel delivered by FedEx in 1960.
Turning to rest of description, there was a substantial increase in the amount of packages delivered by FedEx until 1980 and then it leveled out around 17500 by the end of survey. However, TNT figure saw dramatic rose between 1970 and 1990, and it outstripped the FedEx figure in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | Lovepreet123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | faraj27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | dyekta | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | anuannam | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ainulfahmi | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 75
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 84
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he highest amount of parcels in terms of the delivering at the beginning of peri...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of parcels in terms of the delivering at the beginning of period, it was repla...
^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcels which delivered by FedEx was about three-fold higher compared to TNT, 1500...
^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...delivered by FedEx was about three-fold higher compared to TNT, 15000 and 5000 p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96698113208 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61734227759 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3254498206 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.625 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182468766634 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740314366482 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714837077737 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110060560047 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759813309103 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.