The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart compares the choices of the British from four different kinds of accommodation namely self-catering, caravan, camping and hotel in 2010.
It can be seen that the people of four countries looked hotels which were the most popular type in accommodation all fluctuated in four countries.
Hotels were heavily used in the two countries, England and Scotland, which is 55% and 52% respectively. For self-catering, all four countries used lower than hotels. In England, people who prefered self-catering accounted for 27%, nearly double than the number of people choosing in 2010. Three countries, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, self-catering were booked by the British respectively 30%. 28% and 12%.
Caravan and Camping were the two types of accommodation that the British voted less. In Scotland, camping accounted for the lowest rate of 7%, the highest rate was in Northern Ireland with 31%, England and Wales accounted for 12% and 14% respectively. Besides, Caravan accommodation was the highest choices used in Northern Ireland and at least in England with 7%, while Scotland and Wales were 12% and 9% respectively when the British went on holiday in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | nguyenminhhanh | 73 | view |
- Nowadays, full-time university student tend to focus on their studying. Some people think it is essential for university students to be involved in other activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in the city. 56
- Nowadays, students always play with their smartphones and don’t focus on their studying. What are the causes and effects/ consequences of this problem? 56
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Nowadays, students always play with their smartphones and don’t focus on their studying. What are the causes and effects/ consequences of this problem? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31382978723 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94745653064 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0061317208 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101403803975 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455310621938 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551412680757 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753770409461 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496320752814 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.