The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the choices of the British from four different kinds of accommodation namely self-catering, caravan, camping and hotel in 2010.
It can be seen that the people of four countries booked which was the most popular type in accommodation all fluctuated in four countries.
Hotels were heavily used in the two countries is England and Scotland, is 55% and 52% respectively. For self-catering, all four countries were lower than hotels. In England, people who prefer self-catering accounted for 27%, nearly double the number of people choosing in 2010. Three countries Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, self-catering were booked by the British respectively 30%. 28% and 12%.
Caravan and Camping were the two types of accommodation that the British voted less. In Scotland, camping accounted for the lowest rate of 7%, the highest was in Northern Ireland at 31%, England and Wales accounted for 12% and 14% respectively. Besides, Caravan accommodation was the highest used in Northern Ireland and least in England at 7%, while Scotland and Wales were 12% and 9% respectively when the British went on holiday in 2010.
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in the city. 56
- Advantages and disadvantages of studying at university after finishing high school instead of getting a job immediately. 61
- Nowadays, students always play with their smartphones and don’t focus on their studying. What are the causes and effects/ consequences of this problem? 56
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Watching TV is bad for children Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26775956284 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9785380997 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7780071919 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10332170228 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462508552604 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559376882268 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764629887531 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498806147136 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.