A line graph below shows the percentage of tourists who used different types of transportation in a particular country in 2015
The line graph illustrates the percentage of visitors who used various sorts of transportation in a specific country between January and February in 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of tourists who used different types of transportation increased over the year,only except the users of train.
In January, the percentage of tourists who used train was the highest while the percentage was the lowest for car users,the figure was 90 and 10 respectively.There was a significant increase in the percentage of tourists who used Bike from around 10 to just above 100,a rise of 90% in 9 months between January and mid September.Car The users of car increased very less till May then it rocketed and reached its figure at 90 then it remained constant until December. However the percentage of train users fell dramatically at around 20% in September. On the other hand,there was a moderate increase in the percentage of tourists who used Bus from about 30 to approximately 50 between January and December.
- Essay topics: The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 wo 100
- The given chart shows the number of hours spent by males and females on the computer for work and for leisure in three different year 80
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 11
- The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , only
...f transportation increased over the year,only except the users of train. In Janu...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... percentage was the lowest for car users,the figure was 90 and 10 respectively.There...
^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...s,the figure was 90 and 10 respectively.There was a significant increase in the perce...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Car
...onths between January and mid September.Car The users of car increased very less ti...
^^^
Line 9, column 467, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...en it remained constant until December. However the percentage of train users fell dram...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 568, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...ound 20% in September. On the other hand,there was a moderate increase in the percenta...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 706, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mately 50 between January and December.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11609116664 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 134.34433371 43.030603864 312% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.6 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319584565037 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194811171338 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116161748282 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270575345144 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866368164978 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.