Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries. But increased life expectancy has many implications for individual and for society as a whole. What are the effects of longer living for individuals and society.
According to the research, people tend to have a longer lifespan in different parts of world. This trend implicates individual and social effects that we can learn from. Some potential impacts might be caused and they can be positive and negative.
It is undeniable that the prolonged lifespan reflects a better quality of life due to modernized technology. People have benefited from advanced living environment and easier access to healthcare than ever before, which makes it possible for them to live longer. With relevant government policies and volunteering support, low-class citizens can enjoy equally great public services with abundant subsidies. All these preconditions put a solid foundation of a longer life that people can live.
On the one hand, the increase of life expectancy would lead to more public concerns about life caring in people’s later years. As people grow older, the proportion of social resources would be less sufficient to meet all livers’ needs, which would probably pose a huge pressure to local governments. Apart from that, current scientific results and serving system may probably not cover all aspects of wider health problems and personal issues. As people live longer, there would be no suitable medications and treatments when they become paralyzed, not to mention whether or not they would die at home without anyone knowing it.
On the other hand, the older employable age may bring continuous profits for companies working on diverse fields. One reason is that elder people would probably be more experienced and sophisticated of these jobs and could provide sensible advice to younger workers. In this case, they would be able to contribute to our community and personal firms by playing a consulting role. This would also compensate the insufficiency of young workers by using aged and experienced people.
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their jobs, but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 78
- Some people think young people should be free to choose his or her job,but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The plans show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 575, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...n they become paralyzed, not to mention whether or not they would die at home without anyone k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36610169492 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76328370914 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650847457627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.692729186 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193355175496 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614819061129 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672076402642 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111227052138 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573415789953 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.