Compare percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe
The bar chart shows changes in the proportion of commuters using different forms of transport in a European nation in three separate years.
Overall, there was an increase in the popularity of the car as a mode of transport from 1950 to 1990. Besides, while the figures for bus users fluctuated, people walked and cycled less to work.
In 1950, there was around 35% of people walked to work and nearly 27% of those cycling. However, the figure for the former halved to 17% and the proportion of cyclists also dropped by 5% in 1970. In 1990, the use of the two forms of transport continued to decline, with the figures for bicycles and foot falling to 5% and 10% respectively.
By contrast, the percentage of those driving to work rose dramatically, rising from around 7% in 1950 to just over 35% in 1990. On the other hand, the figure for commuting bus passengers fluctuated. There was 20% of bus commuters in 1950, and this rose to 27% in 1970 before plunging to about 17% at the end of the period.
- Nowadays computers are widely used in education. As a result, some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 84
- Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meat can cause serious health problems.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meat can cause serious health problems.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sport to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60773480663 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54814152735 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4936292914 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0571155993419 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025560907591 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386725901823 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334731223446 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220588451178 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.