The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future.
The diagrams show how the water supply system works in Australia at present and a proposed design for the system in the future.
It is clear that the main changes will happen at the water treatment stage. Besides, the river will no longer be a part of the system in the future.
Currently, dam and storage are the prime sources of pure water in the city and this will remain unchanged in the future system. Waste water, which is the pure water after being used in households, plants and shops, will pass into a water treatment plant in both two systems. However, instead of not processing the waste water and passing it directly into the nearby river, in the future, this type of waste will be recycled into pure water and sent back to the city for consumption.
It can be seen that storm water will receive the same treatment as polluted water in the second diagram, going into the water treatment plant and being recycled before flowing back to the city as pure water. However, water collected from storms in the present system is expected to be travel into the river.
- Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect theenvironment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what efects does this have onanimal life and human society? 56
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 92
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- Advantages and disadvantages of overseas studying 61
- Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meat can cause serious health problems Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s expected to be travel into the river.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1833293575 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2848861214 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343240336137 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184904050249 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175452849628 0.0843802449381 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285095724644 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208909238994 0.0819641961636 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.