The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The following bar chart represent the number of men and women engaged in physical activity of different age groups in Australia in the year of 2010.
Overall, the trend of engaging in physical activity was significantly decreased with the passage of age. However, percentage of women of different age groups taking part in physical activity was considerably higher than man belong to different age groups except the age group of 15 to 24.
In the contest of women, the highest level of participation in exercise was found in the age group of 45 to 54 by 53.3%. The level of participation in physical activity was highest in the age group of 15 to 24 by 52. 8% and least was found in the age group 35 to 44 by 39.5%.
Furthermore, there was significantly increase in the participation of physical activity by women of different age groups of 47.7 % in 15 to 24 age to 52.5 % in 35 to 44 age group to 53% in 55 to 64 age group. Meanwhile, the contribution of men towards physical activity moderately decrease as they get older to 52.8% in 15 to 24 age to 39.5% in 35 to 44 age, while, after passing the age of 44 the participation in physical activity by men gradually increased from 43.1% in 44 to 54 age to 47.6% in 65 plus ages. Moreover, women contribution to physical activity was equivalent in two different age groups by 47.7% and 46.7 % of 15 to 24 age and 65 age respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The Bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarise the information by select the main features, and make comparisons when relevant. 61
- The bar graph below shows the literacy levels of males and females in rural and urban India in 2013, 2015 and 2017. 67
- The bar graph below shows the literacy levels of males and females in rural and urban India in 2013, 2015 and 2017. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58893280632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91088497587 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395256916996 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5777921797 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385194045575 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222887087185 0.103423049105 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986141040527 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301650361606 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781316708366 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.