The table below shows social and economic indicators for countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
The table compares four countries in terms of social and economic factors in the years 1994, based on United Nations statistics.
It is clear that Canada and Japan had the biggest figures. Additionally, the data of Zaire was by far lowest in the four countries.
As can be seen from the table, the average income of Japanese on a yearly basis was highest with 15760 USD, followed by that of Canada with 11100 USD. In comparison, the figures for Peru and Zaire were just around 1% that of Japan. While life expectancy in Canada and Japan were 76 and 78 years respectively, those of the remaining countries were roughly 49 years.
Regarding the rest indicators, Canada had the highest data for daily calorie supply per capita at 3326 calories, compared to Japan at 2846 calories. Meanwhile, this average indicator of both Peru and Zaire was around 1800 calories. In terms of adult literacy rate, Canada and Japan had the same percentage at 99%, as opposed to Zaire which this proportion was just over three times lower that of Canada and Japan. Also, this rate of Peru was at 68%, which doubled the data of Zaire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | SandraWolfie | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | saeed2751366 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | narsindi | 84 | view |
- Often, the most successful people--in business, athletics, entertainment, or any field--are those who have focused all of their attention on achieving a specific goal. Those who spread their energy in many directions may not be as successful. In your opin 56
- the production of electricity from different sources in 4 nations 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people’s behavior. What is your opinion? 73
- The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e percentage at 99%, as opposed to Zaire which this proportion was just over thre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39006270567 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7823491231 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122486107802 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058010411849 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123689115184 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122182196401 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175167602211 0.0819641961636 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.