The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
The given graph reveals the amount of 3 spreads consuming during the period from 1981 to 2007
Overall, it is evident that there was a considerable fluctuation between butter and margarine over 26 years, while the number of low-fat and reduced spreads prevailed from the late 1990
In 1981, the amount of butter witnessed a slight growth for exactly 20 grams, which hit a peak point at 160 grams. In contrast, there was a smooth decline in margarine to approximately 10 grams
From the 1983s until 2007, both plant-based and dairy products fluctuated exponentially. The biggest change was seen in the consumption of butter, which plunged over the 24-year period and stood at 50 grams in 2007. Meanwhile the figures for margarine was high in 1989 and it remained at a similar level until 1995, then fell gradually until dropped at 40 grams. Between 1991 and 1996, low fat and reduced spreads climbed markedly somewhere in the vicinity of 81 grams. As a result, this category used had a tendency to go down to roughly 70 grams in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 95
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examinations 84
- The graph below compares in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 78
- The graph below shows UK rain emissions measure in million of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...r period and stood at 50 grams in 2007. Meanwhile the figures for margarine was high in 1...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85082872928 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58962246304 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635359116022 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.430862022 43.030603864 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.333333333 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198729342439 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786724849152 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792304303087 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149114872062 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129226060017 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.