improving the network of public transport
The importance of improving the network of public transport which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that public transportation. Consequently, the Netherland has an extensive network of road which has helped the economy. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that it is very beneficial for the public. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that it will reduce government revenue. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favor of public transport trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of improving the network of public transportation are indeed too great.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | manraj123 | 92 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | manraj123 | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Noor_23 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all these merits stand in a good stead. Elaborating my viewpoint, there are som...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nst in favor of public transport trend. According to the arguments aforementione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic transportation are indeed too great.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21844660194 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8842673282 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587378640777 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1746405518 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7272727273 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290877658486 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104587095724 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129594972878 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19850914 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105425791338 0.0609392437508 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.