workers are more satisfied when they have different types of tasks.
Throughout history, every individual's job is supposed to give him life satisfaction and as an approach to pacify him. I belive that tis approach will not be fulfilled unless workers do many different type of tasks to do. In what follows, I will aptly elaborate on my perspective.
The first remarkable point to be mentioned is that the human-being soul is unlimited. In other words, humankind have been created with a demanding soul which wants more and more every moment. It needs to experience new things to get calm and satisfied. So employees feel better when they have various kinds of tasks than when they do the repeated tasks from dawn to dusk which can cause depression and anxiety among workers. For example, my father employeed at a airplane industry. His task were repaing different parts of the airplne at first. However, their employer decided to asign him as the repairman of the motors of airplanes. Consequently, he lost his happiness at the wokplace and after a while he suffered from depression. Had his manager not have asigned him for a repeated task, he would not get sick.
Another equally significant reason is that by doing similar tasks all day long, people lose their concentration and they might make undeniable mistakes. Which means, when workers do the same type of work for a long period of time, they would not focus on their task as they would do at the begining. Thus, they might do an erroneous work which may cause trouble for themselves and others. This concept justify not only the workers, but also other people like students and home makers. My own experince is a compelling example of this. Once I had an important physics exam, required to study dynamics for long hours. After a few days I could not concentrate on the subject. Hence, I did not achieved a high score at the end, which made my teachers and parents disappointed.
In conclusion, I assert that if workers have various kinds of work, they would be more interested in what htye are doing. It is highly recommended that managers change his employees' tasks occasionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...will not be fulfilled unless workers do many different type of tasks to do. In what follows, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rs. For example, my father employeed at a airplane industry. His task were repain...
^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ers do the same type of work for a long period of time, they would not focus on their task as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 617, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uired to study dynamics for long hours. After a few days I could not concentrate on t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 691, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'achieve'
Suggestion: achieve
...ntrate on the subject. Hence, I did not achieved a high score at the end, which made my ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84033613445 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6691929516 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591036414566 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0594746893 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5454545455 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2272727273 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210732389867 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483000569352 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714538512063 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128410940261 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336335094974 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.