Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A problem of modern societies is plastic pollution from excessive packaging, with conflicting views on how to tackle this worrying trend. One possible solution is to encourage manufacturers to cut down good packaging in industrial sectors.
Advocates of this believe that manufacturers and supermarkets are where all of the plastics on earth are originally produced. Therefore, assuming businesses were legally forced to limit goods packaging by plastic, less plastic waste would be disposed into the environment and find its way into the marine system as well as human stomach. The responsibilities to society being fulfilled by companies may also improve the image and reputation of that company on the market, which likely lead to increased sales as well as profits.
However, this approach disregards the incurred cost which is not interesting to corporations. Replacing plastic with environmentally friendly materials such as glass, paper or organic polymer, companies must invest in expensive technologies together with design alterations. Water bottle made of glass, for instance, cost more to produce and require specialized machineries to inscribe brand marketing on the bottle as compared to traditional plastic ones.
From a personal perspective, a better solution would be educating the customers to lower plastic good consumption. Not only will the effect be successful on a large scale, raising consumers’ awareness is more plausible and feasible. Education about the harmful consequences will either persuade people to avoid plastic packaging, or motivate them to find innovative ways to reuse their plastic products. For example, seasoning containers or planting pots can be created from used plastic jars.
To conclude, relying on manufacturer to reduce packaging is too financially impractical and would not have the desired results. It is better to inform everyone of the dangers from discarding plastic, along with the proper ways to discard those plastics.
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 66
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. Measured in tonnes. 78
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 (percentage) 89
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university. 73
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ustrial sectors. Advocates of this believe that manufacturers and supermarkets are...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...anufacturers and supermarkets are where all of the plastics on earth are originally produc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69899665552 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10277420212 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645484949833 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4921080131 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124961725549 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441034901031 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038540934121 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743764284748 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353019631883 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.