The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
The charts provide information about how much money was earned by sales Fairtrade products, such as coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Overall, coffee sales experienced a significant increase in all the given countries. As for the sales of bananas, Denmark and Sweden showed an incrediable decrease while the numbers of remaining countries growed. Another worth noticing fact is that the number one ranked country in terms of bananas sales was Switzerland in both 1999 and 2004.
Looking at the details of coffee, it can be seen that Switzerland had the greatest amount of money, showing 3 million euros. The figure of the UK are lower tahn that one of Denmark, 1,5 and 1,8 in turn.
In 2004, coffee sales grew twice in Switzerland, but the highest sale experienced in the USA, at 20 million euros.
Turning to the details of bananas, Switzerland headed the list with 15 million euros jn 1999. Other countries' sale were less than 2 million euros. I. 2004, bananas sale in Swifzerland rises about three times. Also, the numbers of the UK and Belgium went upward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- Time schoolchildren (10-11 years old) spend on different home activities 56
- The chart below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 89
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The first chart below shows how many energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...st with 15 million euros jn 1999. Other countries sale were less than 2 million euros. I....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91397849462 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55244448113 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0513201081 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329685204462 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118051897723 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119017593879 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189227912517 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131817532574 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.