Integrated writing. Summerise the poinst made in the reading and lecture
The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing the spread of zebra mussel in parts of North America and its detrimental consequences. The author describes three problems that have created due to the spread of zebra mussels. However, the professor effectively opposes this argument and refutes each of the point made in the reading.
First, the author mentions that mussels transfer from Europe to the east coast of North America by ballast water of ships and will soon colonize all of North America. However, the lecturer believes that there is an effective way to manage this situation. For instance, ships can empty the ballast water and refill in the ocean. Mussels could not endure salty water of the ocean and soon will die.
Second, the reading posits that zebra mussels in new habitat become dominant as they can cope with different conditions.Furthermore, they have no predators, hence they can reproduce easily and their population would increase rapidly. By contrast , the professor points out that when the population of mussels increases some of the aquatic birds change their feeding habits and feed on these mussels.
Finally, the author mentions the point that as zebra mussels feed on planktons, they become a food competitor for other fishes and have negative effects on the overall population of other freshwater fishes. The professor consedes the negative effect of mussels on the fish population that feeds on planktons but asserts that these mussels have a positive impact on the population of bottom fishes. Mussels produce nutrients for bottom fishes.
Whereby, the reading is contradicted by the listening because of the mentioned reasons.
- LEADERS AND DIRECTORS IN ALL ORGANIZATIONS ARE NORMALLY OLDER PEOPLE. SOME PEOPLE THINK YOUNGER LEADER WOULD BE BETTER.AGREE OR DISAGREE 67
- Integrated 3
- Some people to live in house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 56
- Do you agree or diagree with the following statemnt? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples. 80
- Nowdays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...they can cope with different conditions.Furthermore, they have no predators, hence they can...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e no predators, hence they can reproduce easily and their population would increa...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion would increase rapidly. By contrast , the professor points out that when the ...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hen the population of mussels increases some of the aquatic birds change their feeding habi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70875947055 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541044776119 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7029733731 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0621303332159 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272280325057 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381792558955 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463709307502 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390357753316 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.