It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Some people argue that technological advances can neither fit in with traditional cultures nor go hand in hand with it. While it is true in some societies, at the same time, it has largely benefitted in preservation of many cultures.
On one hand, technology driven industrial era, attributed to the displacement of many societies living in villages and mountainous regions. For example, In India, the sudden boom in the industrialization caused people to disperse away to the cities and plains to keep their professions. These communities, which had a strong sense towards practicing their culture, are now too busy to celebrate a cultural event. Now, their hometowns appear deserted and cultures look ignored and forgotten. Thus, this revolution forced mass displacements and certainly turned the worlds upside down, let alone culture.
On the other hand, major breakthroughs not only preserved of many cultures but also brought many forgotten ones to limelight. Many edifices of historical importance in India, for instance, which were at the brink of crumbling down. These building were brought to life by novel engineering inventions, aiding in preservation of the traditional heritages. Other traditional civilizations, unknown to humans, were revealed to world. For instance, the long-lost Harappa civilization’s history are now the part of children’s textbooks. Overall, such new groundbreaking enhancements aided in the upkeep of many cultures as well as saved many.
In conclusion, many traditional ways of life have been lost because of advances in technology, but other aspects of culture have survived for the world to witness it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | b.yousefi | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Jayant Chohda | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | Kiseock jang | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | Kiseock jang | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-23 | winstonleonard | 73 | view |
- The use of mobile phones in public places is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places, so mobile phones should be banned in the same way. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Nowadays people show more anti social behavior and lack of respect to others. What are the causes of this? How we can improve it? 56
- The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... displacements and certainly turned the worlds upside down, let alone culture. On...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57086614173 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27571594627 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3405358174 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178071437884 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574171201087 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535911585073 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113441292936 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291111752882 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.