Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Indeed, there is a substantial rise in the usage of technical inventions. Will this technology appease both the rich and weaker sections of the nation? While few people believe that these inventions increase the barrier between the well-off and poor people, it seems to me that current technology acts as a bridge between them.
To begin with, there are only a few scientific inventions that further toughens the gap between the rich and poor. Recent inventions in the technology sector are proved to be expensive and are affordable only by the well-off sections of society. Because of such pricing, many backward people are staying away to these advancements, and this is the prime reason for the division caused between them. The pre-eminent example for this is the Apple products which are enormously expensive and could only be bought by the higher sections of the communities. Therefore, if such exclusive gadgets continue to permeate the markets, then the gap between these two communities would never be complete.
However, there are a variety of advancements happened in the technological department for which I would argue that these could diminish the gap between them. Social networking, transport applications facilitates everyone and are widely used by both the sections of the society. Although some technical instruments are made expensive, a wide variety of applications could run on cheaper gadgets and are accessible to both rich and the poor eradicating the differences between them. Applications such as Ola, Uber could be considered as a perfect example for such inventions which are being used by everyone. Therefore, recent advancements are proved to mitigate the gap between people.
In conclusion, though few technical inventions widened the gap between the rich and poor, it seems to me that various other discoveries bought every section of the society together under one roof.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | sexd.hdj@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate only locally produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate only locally produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Essay topics: Many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that good social skills is as important as good qualifications to succeed in job? 61
- Essay topics: Many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that good social skills is as important as good qualifications to succeed in job? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nology acts as a bridge between them. To begin with, there are only a few scie...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... communities would never be complete. However, there are a variety of advancem...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to mitigate the gap between people. In conclusion, though few technical inve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33663366337 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86938596442 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488448844884 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9193063618 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198269648552 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701772986819 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569801015782 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133090092048 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454303708036 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.