birds and ways to prevent them from flying into the buildings
Both the reading and the lecture are about birds and building designs. The author of the reading passage feels there are three possible ways for preserving wild birds' safety by preventing them from getting injured by the buildings; however, the professor finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the solutions proposed by the writer of the text.
To begin with, the author mentions that using one-way glass can be effective, as birds and other animals would not be able to see inside the building and it would refrain them from flying into the building. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He brings up the fact that although by using one-way glass we would prevent birds from seeing inside the building, they would see the reflection of the environment surrounding the building in the glass. Hence, while they see the reflection of the sky or other trees on the glass, they would not be able to distinguish them as a reflection and would fly into them nonetheless.
Secondly, the author holds the view that using colorful stripes on the windows can be beneficial because while people can see outside, birds would see the stripes and avoid trying to fly through the glass. In contrast, the speaker rebuts this hypothesis by underlying the fact that birds would want to fly into the open holes when they see them and for using this method in a way that it would actually work, the designers should make openings extremely small and if they do that it will end up in room being tremendously dim.
Finally, the writer posits that by creating an artificial magnetic field, they can guide birds away from the buildings, as birds have intrinsic ability to sense Earth' magnetic fields. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this issue due to the fact that birds do not use this ability in short distances. He elaborates on this idea by noting that while birds have such ability, they use it only in migrating and for long distances and for short distances they use their eyes and brightness of the light. As a consequent creating magnetic fields would not be effective in shunning birds from flying towards the buildings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | guna | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Question : Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Possible solutions to save frogs from extinction. 85
- For the students ages 5 10 it is better to take a break for every one hour of instruction or let them to focus on lessons for a longer period of time 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 507, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...their eyes and brightness of the light. As a consequent creating magnetic fields w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in short, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82336956522 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42894656739 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48097826087 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3727473982 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.916666667 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349642518754 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136242598445 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852859510751 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220053408827 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072271883612 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.