The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart represents the 5 different categories of one country between 2015 and 2016. The table data gives information about change of values in each years.
it is clear from the data that petroleum products has most values in both 2 years. also, engineered goods increased by almost 10% from 55% to 63%.
Now turning into the details, textiles increased dramatically by 15% in a period of time. However, it is still the lowest among other values. As I mentioned before, petroleum products was highest in both two years. Even though, it did not go up that much. also, agricultural products has not rose.
At last, gems and jewelry has fallen by tiny fraction to 41% from 46% in 2016. gems and jewelry was only one dropped, although all the other categories moved upwards. On the other hand, engineered goods became almost the highest one in the last year of the period.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t change of values in each years. it is clear from the data that petroleum p...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...oducts has most values in both 2 years. also, engineered goods increased by almost 1...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased by almost 10% from 55% to 63%. Now turning into the details, textiles i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...iles increased dramatically by 15% in a period of time. However, it is still the lowest among ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ven though, it did not go up that much. also, agricultural products has not rose. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...ch. also, agricultural products has not rose. At last, gems and jewelry has ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so, agricultural products has not rose. At last, gems and jewelry has fallen by ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gems
... tiny fraction to 41% from 46% in 2016. gems and jewelry was only one dropped, altho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81045751634 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46884124007 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640522875817 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.4230758079 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.3333333333 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.75 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163029766648 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551434258864 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930832027629 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115180721168 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141456196302 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.73 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.