Rich countries are helping poor countries through money, but they should also help them in another way. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Affluent nations are offering financial aid to the needed nations to overcome the crisis. However, they should alleviate problems in pragmatic way rather than the monetary help. I totally agree with this view because of below pertinent reasons.
The most compelling reason to hold my point of view is that pecuniary help is not always a right way to resolve many severe problems. To cite an example, bad conditions such as flood, earthquake, drought, hurraincane or volcano situations need selter and food rather than only money. However repeating situations demand permentant resoluation, instead of same money help again and again. For example, many nations are facing a deliberate attacks by terrorist. Hence this should be handle via sensible way to resolve the issue from the root. Therefore above points proves that money is not the only solutions for some problems.
To add further credence to my assertion is that nations who gave the money, never know that wheather their money are getting use at the right place or not. Sometimes, needed nations are receiving more money than they actually need. Therefore, in some conditions money gets wasted without knowingness of the nation which offer money to needed country for real problems.
The points I have hither to considered, let me to the inevitable conclusion that pecuniary help is not the only way to resolve the problems, there are many other sensible way to overcome the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | milindpatel4416 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne or volcano situations need selter and food rather than only money. However rep...
^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...elter and food rather than only money. However repeating situations demand permentant ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'attack'?
Suggestion: attack
...e, many nations are facing a deliberate attacks by terrorist. Hence this should be hand...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...cing a deliberate attacks by terrorist. Hence this should be handle via sensible way ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'handled'?
Suggestion: handled
...acks by terrorist. Hence this should be handle via sensible way to resolve the issue f...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...way to resolve the issue from the root. Therefore above points proves that money is not t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'conditions'' or 'condition's'?
Suggestion: conditions'; condition's
... they actually need. Therefore, in some conditions money gets wasted without knowingness o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry for real problems. The points I have hither to considered, let me to t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, hence, however, so, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18644067797 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57196059985 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60593220339 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5522274749 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1538461538 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182212079257 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638686282944 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484743246724 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110578295081 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011879933372 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.