The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatning issues such as global warming.
There are some conflicted views among environmental experts, as others argue that, nations should decrease funding availed to local environmental drawbacks, and channel it to more pressing problems like global warming. In my opinion, government's main focus of funding should be directed to discuss local environmental problems, as they are the primary contributory factors of global warming. However, funding should be allocated to massive cutting of carbon dioxide emission projects globally.
First and foremost, addressing the main cause of global warming from primary level brings longterm solution in reducing effects of global warming. Local governments should invest huge sums of money in developing environmental friendly transport systems, such as, high-speed rail, which uses renewable source of energy like solar, wind or ocean or tidal currents. This development makes a huge difference, as it cut down net carbon emission.
Furthermore, some common practises such as cloud seeding can be initiated by nations. Silver iodide is ejected directly into the clouds, there will be temperature reduction, resulting in precipitation and the outcome is rainfall. If it is consistently done, it mitigate global warming, apart from its effects on the environment, if stopped abruptly.
However, nations should come together and give towards this noble thing of reducing global warming. There is no receding on global warming but, its pace can be reduced by cutting down net carbon emission rate. An emission budget can be set, with a target internationally in accordance with goals, other than, a specific global temperature.
In conclusion, governments should invest huge sums of money in educating the citizens on ways to cut down carbon dioxide emission and use alternative renewable sources of energy like solar, wind , shunning fossil fuels which contribute significantly to global warming.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal of money more than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified, while others think it is unfair 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 73
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of wether the course 61
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in all faculties of a major university in 2012. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...bal warming. In my opinion, governments main focus of funding should be directed to discus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mitigates'?
Suggestion: mitigates
...ainfall. If it is consistently done, it mitigate global warming, apart from its effects ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wable sources of energy like solar, wind , shunning fossil fuels which contribute ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7027972028 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93419100713 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8808961651 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297103324325 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101927474549 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727469514398 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159347480959 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736288742338 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.