In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Now a days, there are so many innovative works were materials are invented and still many researcher and scientist are struggling to change a world more convenient and safe. Most of significant contributions are sometimes influenced by past achievements but some are not.
Admittedly, most of the new research are based on the precede achievements. For instance, Facebook founder get an idea from the graduate photo books which they want people to get connected. Their constant thinking eventually leads big social media platform. Furthermore, post-it sticker notes was the failure work of past works, which was to make strong adhesive glue. Those of significant works were based on the preceding works and research.
However, some of the works came from the unintended situations. Newton's gravity laws was firstly came up with the Newton because of a sudden trop of apple. This laws was made of totally different field or situations. But this kind of new approaches are faced many objection by other conventional scientists.
While strong arguments can be made for and against the given statement, agreement seems more plausible. New contribution and materials are sometimes came up with and change the world, but most of the significant contribution can see the light if the basic research and study can support and maximized the influence. Because other people can easily understand and accept easily.
In conclusion, there might have many different thought of the above issues. But I take a position on past achievements within that filed can make significant contribution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 50
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 50
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora Medical experts say that only one quarter of Corpora s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness even though twenty years ago one half of all of Corpora s citizens me 53
- The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time period, however, the price of milk at the local Excello Food Market has increa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days, there are so many innovative works wer...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
Now a days, there are so many innovative works wer...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun researcher seems to be countable; consider using: 'many researchers'.
Suggestion: many researchers
...s were materials are invented and still many researcher and scientist are struggling to change ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., most of the new research are based on the precede achievements. For instance, Facebook fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...eding works and research. However, some of the works came from the unintended situatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...tions. Newtons gravity laws was firstly came up with the Newton because of a sudden ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...wton because of a sudden trop of apple. This laws was made of totally different fiel...
^^^^
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...se of a sudden trop of apple. This laws was made of totally different field or situ...
^^^
Line 13, column 151, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...ontribution and materials are sometimes came up with and change the world, but most ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 33, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...y. In conclusion, there might have many different thought of the above issues. But I take...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 251.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37848605578 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90183187728 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9513375871 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.375 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183896102447 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554689011093 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787286642206 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971305542463 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407100807159 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.