the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Information on how the amount of water used by three sectors changed during a century and water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000 is presented in the graph and table.
As regards global water use, figures increased over the period. Figures for agriculture and industry rose steadily until around 1950. Then, levels went up dramatically, reaching a high of about 3000 km and 12000 km in 2000 respectively. Household consumption rose marginally until 1970. In the following years, figures grew moderately, with roughly 500 km being consumed in 2000.
Regarding water consumption in the countries, Brazil consumed more than Congo. Water consumption per person in Brazil with 176 million people was 359 m while it was only 8 m in Congo with 5.2 million people. The area irrigated in Brazil was 26500 km whereas just 100 km was irrigated in Congo.
To sum up, it can be inferred that there was a direct relationship between the world population growth and water consumption rise and Brazil's agriculture was far more developed than that of Congo.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-20 | nikcynsm | 78 | view |
| 2016-02-18 | desiayukusuma | 60 | view |
| 2015-06-24 | tstariq | 60 | view |
| 2015-04-02 | Fadlanmuzakki | 80 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your own op 67
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the charts below give information on the ages of the population of yemen and italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, then, whereas, while, as regards, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76280839077 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5811364492 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156879151113 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690127364314 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737076439003 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111953420887 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740965850844 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.