Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
While it is a known experience to make the working week 5 day long, I personally agree with the statement made in the question. In the eyes of an employee, having a short work-week with long hours is more pleasant because of all the advantages both in personal and professional aspects.
Personally, working only three days a week will make the job more interesting and, occasionally, people can avoid the problem of boredom in the office. Everyone loves weekend, so, most of the office workers spend their working time on Friday waiting to the end of the day. Having 4 days free in a week could make the job more beloved, also, the weekend will not be something magical and unusual to wait for. I remember when I was still working part-time and spending only 8 hours a day on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday, I never got tired from my job and never had waited until weekends. Hence, I worked more efficient and was always in the mood to learn.
From the professional aspect, having long hours in a working day will increase the productivity. When people are working with shorter hours many meetings and tasks can be postponed until the next day. That can negatively affect the working mood and the learning process everyone makes while working. Otherwise, with longer working hours, the employee would make their tasks in time more efficiently and will not leave it for later, because there are not many days in a week, when they can accomplish their tasks. I face this issue everyday. I always procrastinate tasks or articles that I should read at the end of the day until the next morning. When I worked part time as I mentioned above, I did not have that problem, so I could work more professionally and more effectively.
Taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, the job with only three days work-week is much more efficient and enjoyable than one with the five days work-week, and even the long hours of work is not a disadvantage but an advantage, therefore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 60
- Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong. Compare the 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...complish their tasks. I face this issue everyday. I always procrastinate tasks or articl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...y until the next morning. When I worked part time as I mentioned above, I did not have t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime as I mentioned above, I did not have that problem, so I could work more profe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73121387283 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65182663523 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2677096268 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0577475457503 0.236089414692 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252911165927 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474455384006 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567200585327 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507550124685 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.