The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016
The pie charts illustrate the amount of income that a charitable organization for children situated in the USA earned and allocated in 2016.
Overall, donated food constituted the majority of the income resources, while most of the finances were spent on program services. Also, it can be seen that total revenue resources just exceeded outgoings.
In detail, donated food was the main source of funds for the children’s charity with a proportion of 86.6%. The figure for community contributions was 10.4%, which was the second-largest revenue source and followed by about 2.2% from program revenue. By contrast, government grants, investment income, and other income made up unremarkably similar proportions at 0.2%, 0.2%, and 0.4% respectively.
Turning to the remainings pie chart, program services brought in most of the expenses at 95.8%. Meanwhile, fundraising and management and general were insignificant sources of spending, accounting for 2.6% and 1.6% in order. Furthermore, the total receiving fund was $53,561,580 this year and the total cost was $53,224,896. Their savings in 2016 were just over 330,000 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Duong Linh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Bhanu Kishore | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
- The world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population, which is causing problems not only for poor, undeveloped countries, but also for industrialised and developed nations. Describe some of the problems that overpopulation causes, and suggest at le 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 63
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60693641618 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03472061633 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664739884393 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8672060963 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156762197827 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057129504085 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757744717815 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107428475609 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946978940105 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.