Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is often debatable that whether Govt. funds should be spent on building new infrastructure, for instance museums and town halls, or in preserving the old ones. I believe that renovating existing structures will help in saving money and preserving our rich culture. So, this essay will discuss these boons in detail.
Creating new public buildings will cost more money to the government. However, renovating the old ones will save that extra expense. This will save the funds which can further be allocated to more serious concerns. To cite an example, countries like India have more important issues where money can be spend. Funds can be invested in upgrading education system, curb poverty and in creating more employment for the youth.
Moreover, culture of a country is very well represented by their old monuments, forts, museums etc. Preserving these treasures will further exhort tourism and will aid in economic development of a country. This will also increase the employment opportunities for the locals. To exemplify, more chefs, hotel managers, travel guides and tour guides will be in demand. Thus, preserving culture serve many benefits.
In winding up, It seems that governments will save unnecessary expenses and can spend funds on more deserving areas as well as save their cultural heritage.
- Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want To what extent should children have to follow the rules Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example f 44
- You have been offered a job, asking you to start next week. You want the job very much but, because of a previous commitment, you want to delay the start for another two weeks.Write to the Manager, accepting the job, but explaining your situation and aski 56
- Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You have been offered a job, asking you to start next week. You want the job very much but, because of a previous commitment, you want to delay the start for another two weeks.Write to the Manager, accepting the job, but explaining your situation and aski 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 4.92783505155 304% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 32.9175257732 46% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 26.3917525773 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 937.175257732 119% => OK
No of words: 210.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32380952381 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6975255311 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 127.690721649 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62380952381 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 290.88556701 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5781330729 44.8134815571 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5333333333 76.5299724578 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 16.8248392259 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 4.34317383033 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144819829949 0.216113520407 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530056301704 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752639807657 0.0603063233224 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912452505295 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085477812761 0.0580467560999 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 70.7449484536 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 7.45979381443 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 8.71597938144 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 41.2886597938 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.