Some people prefer young leaders, while others think senior managers have the experience. What do you think?
Leadership is playing an important rule when it comes to successful business management. It is argued whether young leaders can be more effective in working life or senior managers are. I am of the belief that future generations should take their opportunity in the leadership community. This essay will manifest the reasons why I prefer young leaders.
Firstly, in the modern era, young leaders are more informed and influenced when it comes to the technology revolution. Not only does youth have the scientific knowledge of the latest inventions but also they use them to develop their management. On other words, youth leadership has become a global leap; they can implement modern strategies rather than elder managers. A prime example, the spread of youth leadership training programs which ensure the importance of youth voice.
Secondly, future generations have the spirit of improvement and development. As an illustration, they possess the spirit of positive action to prove themselves which helps in developing their surroundings. Moreover, they have the aim of success to leave a mark in their career for the following generations which helps in raising the challenging spirit between youth; this can reduce unemployment. For instance, the successful French president, Emmanuel Macron, was publicly selected by the end of his thirties due to his honourable political career history.
In conclusion, I would like to restate my opinion that youngsters deserve the chance to prove that they are able to lead our community organizations. It is highly recommended that governments should raise the awareness of their rights in leadership positions which gives them the intense interest to a broaden their horizons to have faith and give their best.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | ahmed ahmed | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ahmed ahmed | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ahmed ahmed | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ahmed ahmed | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ahmed ahmed | 73 | view |
- You have lost an item of value on a train. Write a letter to the railway company. In your letter describe the item.Explain where and when you left itSay what action you would like the company to take write at least 150 words. 73
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historical buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it Write a letter to the city council and in your letter mention the below What is the importance of the building Why should it b 11
- you have a computer issue ask you manger to help you 73
- Some people prefer young leaders, while others thinks senior managers have the experience. What do you think? 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or a negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h ensure the importance of youth voice. Secondly, future generations have the sp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hich gives them the intense interest to a broaden their horizons to have faith and give t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zons to have faith and give their best.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39130434783 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92577791938 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61231884058 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0265218197 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814826983864 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313847157204 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409786048535 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516813336436 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399476494268 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.