Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions.
It is obvious that graduates, when embarking on their first careers, usually receive some negative feedback because of their lack of vital soft skills. It seems that two main reasons leading to this issue, and this can be mitigated by effective solutions.
Two primary factors should be held accountable for this problem. Firstly, it is likely that the education system still concentrates too much on knowledge instead of developing practical skills. For instance, in Viet Nam, teachers and parents usually require students to make a good grade in academic subjects and consider that a student who has been at the top of the class would be the best one. As a result, students spend no time on extra-curricular activities, which is an effective way to develop their social skills, especially cooperative skills. Secondly, living in an environment where parents are overprotective could be another factor. Parental involvement in formative years could shape a person's personality. Therefore, if parents always spoon-feed their children, they will become indifferent and do not know how to take care of the people around them.
Several measures could be adopted to alleviate this issue. Firstly, the government should pay more attention and funding to organize vocational training courses for students, especially teamwork skills. For instance, Huong Duong Viet is an organization established to provide the necessary soft skills for students, which helps them know how to work together, making a huge contribution to their professions in their future. In addition, students or new employees should have an awareness of self-improving their abilities. By registering useful courses or receiving advice from supportive colleagues, they could acquire vital skills to become better.
In conclusion, this problem is attributable to a number of reasons, but with the cooperation of governments and individuals, we could mitigate it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Lâm Kim Yến | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 73
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions. 84
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand andGermany in 1980 and 2010. 56
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...vement in formative years could shape a persons personality. Therefore, if parents alwa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 844, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ent and do not know how to take care of the people around them. Several measures could be adopted to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51178451178 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02959961907 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649831649832 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4354731704 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152519575641 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470027675183 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607766036079 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922414849812 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518597593289 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.