Individual can do nothing to improve our environment; only and large companies can make a difference
Environmental degradation is a major concern in our society. Some people are of the opinion that only the government and large firm can influence the environment positively and nothing can be done by individual to make the environment better. I complete disagree with this aforementioned view considering that a change in people's and environmental sanitation can contribute immensely in sustaining the environment.
To begin, one of the primary roles of individual in developing the environment is a change of attitude. There are several practices done by people that can be changed in improving our environment. These activities include accumulation of waste and improper waste disposal. People purchase varieties of items that are of no value to them thereby resulting in increase production of garbage. Also, this waster are hazardous and degrading to our environment if they are not properly disposed. To illustrate, the proportion of waste generated by households in the last two months upsurge by 38% and major of these households fails at disposing their waste properly as revealed in a survey conducted by Lagos state environmental agency. Reduction in purchase of irrelevant item will not only influence the atmosphere positively, it will as well benefit their finances and the economy.
Furthermore, sanitizing the environment will contribute substantially to the environment. Keeping the environment clean begins from individuals room and society. Rendering the vicinity free of toxic and harmful substances will contribute to the ecosystem. For instance, the youth's of Ibadan oyo state creates an initiative, in which they troop out in masses to clean out the city on the stipulated day. As a result, the city is transformed, well-clean and free of waste.
To sum up, sustaining the environment is the responsibility of everyone, i disagree with the opinion that individual has no role to play in sustaining the environment because proper waste disposal and environmental sanitation is vital to an eco-friendly environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Đỗ Anh Tuấn | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information sh 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweighs the disadvantages? 73
- Due to development and rapid expansion in some countries, many small business are unable to compete. Some people thinks closure of local business will bring about death to local communities. To what extent do you agree 73
- Some people think that the government should take care of the disadvantaged people such as unemployed and homeless people.To what extent do u agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. As a result, the city is transformed, well-clean and free of waste. T...
^^
Line 21, column 74, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ment is the responsibility of everyone, i disagree with the opinion that individu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54920634921 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30659876067 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7043497159 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235235900249 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734775894231 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937640112881 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150253523965 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128658163092 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.