The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The advancement in technology have put human being into a dilemma of balancing between rising demand for energy and electric power and the urge of reducing greenhouse gas emission. For sake of sustainable development as well as our offspring’s well being, action for stifling exploite of fossil fuels are expected and celebrated.
The ever serious environmental situation presses the governments to joint together and fight with the worldwide energetic issue. Constraining the consumption of nonrenewable resources is the first right move for resolving the challenge such as global warming and water contamination. Due to the continuous high temperature in Africa and Asia, the already vulnerable rural dwellers are at risk of droughts and the spreading of epidemic disease. Australia, this summer, have suffered the unprecedented long-lasting and wide-spreading bush fire. Thousands of wildlife died in this disastrous fire. The frequency and influence of such extreme weather have increased year by year, without immediate and effective measure to suppress from the stem (reduce consumption of fossil fuel) would lead to more devastating consequences.
The second step is to find clean and sustainable alternatives to ensure stable supply of energy. It is noteworthy that every country consumes a tremendous amount of electric and other power source per day. The mission for exploring supplements are of the same importance. Our daily life have been inundated with all kinds of energy consuming devices and shortage in power would definitely crash the whole system of communication, transportation and more importantly, justice. You cannot image the way how people crawling through dark nights and how bank operating without internet. Violence and criminality are easily to breed in a chaos and unbalanced world. Therefore, authorities must replace the original power source with a perfect alternative to make sure the current massive energy-consuming world could operate as before.
In conclusion, international organization should calling for the worldwide policymakers taking actions and strictly prohibit the usage of gas and coral, and simultaneously emphasis the importance of the popularize of its environmental-friendly replacements.
- With growing population in cities more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas Is it a positive or negative development 84
- In some countries, the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this case? What can be done to reduce this problem? 89
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed when they are used as money-making machines aims at tourists,other people believe that it is the only way to save such conditions in the world today.Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld definitely crash the whole system of communication, transportation and more i...
^^
Line 13, column 200, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...multaneously emphasis the importance of the popularize of its environmental-friendly replaceme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79279279279 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35321560083 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660660660661 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8866402923 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114463621669 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272703476229 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298879924751 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579066368031 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140717503203 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.