OG2 - professors appearance in TV programs and its outcomes.
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the merites and the demerits of being professors of uiversities as an experts in the tv. In the reading part, the author mentioned that this practice has several advantages, renging from publice to universities; in the listening part, however, the speaker challenges what the author states and rebutes the reasons.
To began with, as mentioned in the article, the author sets forth that professor take various benefiths, many individuals being aware professors' idea. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes the reasons asserting that they might waste their time on stuffs that are unimportant and their colleges might not take them siriously. Indeed, they should have been on-campes, searching, instead of looked as paying attention to interntainmants.
Secondly, the author points out that universities taken the advatages too by increasing their aufience as well as absorb donates for the academic reasechings; Nonetheless, the professor flatly contradicts the idea and contends that they might loos the time for academic studitng, looking good, prepare themdelves for tv shows. while, their sutidents demand their time for important things.
Finally, the author claims that many people can conect to the professors, learning thing from experties, whereas, many residents do not have the aportunity to contact specialists. In contrast, professor is of the opinion that publice does not requer forer depth in academic matters, as tv producers rend to academic title. THese subjects that professors introduce on tv programs, tv reporters can do it with berif knowledege on that concept.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 90 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | farhadmoqimi | 80 | view |
- TPO 22 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 85
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 76
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.A. Control the time they spend on TV or movie.B. Take more time to chat with children.C. Monitor the interaction between children and their peers 81
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing TaskIn the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wil 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an expert' or simply 'experts'?
Suggestion: an expert; experts
...s of being professors of uiversities as an experts in the tv. In the reading part, the aut...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the article, the author sets forth that professor take various benefiths, many i...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...benefiths, many individuals being aware professors idea. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... good, prepare themdelves for tv shows. while, their sutidents demand their time for ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.556 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85410861741 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6247768667 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.9 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128391397374 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549146105638 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06013752424 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760256665868 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344236435916 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.