Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.
One of the main ways in today's world to become successful and productive members of a society for young people is education which is usually considered being the responsibility of governments whose main financial resource relies on taxes. It is argued that parents who pay tuition and property taxes and send their offspring to non-government or parochial schools should be exempt from paying taxes that back up the public school system. However, I completely disagree with this statement, and will explain why in this following essay.
Firstly, we must consider the potential negatives of this statement. Receiving all taxes allocated to public schools only from lower social status families who have to send their children to governmental schools may put extra pressure on them and cause such families to work more and harder to be able to afford the taxes, resulting in having insufficient time to spend quantity and quality time with their children or adolescents who are in need of their parents' emotional supports in this very crucial stage of development. This may lead to behavioral problems not only at but also at schools in the long run, including poor academic performances, bullying, truancy, and delinquency. A further reason to be wary of this idea is that families who categorized into the upper class can afford to send their kids to non-public schools, and then whether they pay taxes to make a significant contribution to the public school system or not does have a minimal effect on the way they live, whereas it can make a huge difference in the quality of public education system and the expenditure of families who are middle and lower classes.
Of course, it is true that paying taxes to what you do not use might initially appear unfair, making some of them feel discriminated and angry. Despite this, many such wealthy families are happy to help, whether by taxes or by charity, both to the impoverished and the prosperity of their own countries, bringing about a less gap between the rich and the poor, a decrease in child labor and school leavers.
To conclude, I believe that all members of society, especially wealthy families should not be excluded from paying the-public-school-system schools due to the improvement of schools' quality and children's academic performance and the prevention of problems such as inequality and possible children's behavioral issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | ahmadrava88 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | wIsaac | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | dohong0812 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Garrett | 78 | view |
- The table shows the number of foreign visitors (in millions) to 7 countries. 67
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. 84
- Due to the increasing density of living areas in a city, most residents are suffering from physical and social dangers. Consequently, they are against living in the city.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 73
- Some people think the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather than to benefit them as individuals. To some extent do you agree or disagree. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...possible childrens behavioral issues.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, whereas, of course, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14503816794 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94229013971 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.384025686 49.4020404114 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.2 106.682146367 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.3 20.7667163134 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414258070672 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142115284155 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131171418937 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241676468239 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736782662584 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.0946893788 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.