The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origion where the visitors came from.
The line graph provides information about the number of yearly travellers to Australia by foreign residents. While, the table depicts the countries whose residents went to Australia between 1975 and 2005.The data is calibrated in millions.From the overall analysis, it is manifest that in the line graph, there was a significant increase who were visited to Australia.
At the first glance, it is conspicuous that in the initial year, 10 millions visitors were made to Australia. while, it was a one fold of 1985 year. After 2 decades, tha number of travellers had reached to around 25 millions followed by, it was jumped to about 31 millions.
moving towards table, minimum visitors came from china, whereas, the majority of the visitors came from Japan to 3.2 millions, followed by South Korea was the second highst which number of vositors hai hone to Australia to 2.9 millions in 1975 year. while, in the last year, most or the people visit to Australia than 1975 year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Anmolpreet kaur | 78 | view |
- There is an increase social problems involving youth because parents spend their time at work .to what extent do you agree or disagree. 11
- These days ,the usage of internet is very common .what are the benefits of internet 56
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen mary hospital since its construction in 1969 . 73
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origion where the visitors came from. 78
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television, however , television cannot replace the book as a learning tool ,which is why children are less well.educated today .to waist extent do you agree or disagree . 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...went to Australia between 1975 and 2005.The data is calibrated in millions.From the...
^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...2005.The data is calibrated in millions.From the overall analysis, it is manifest th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...llions visitors were made to Australia. while, it was a one fold of 1985 year. After ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...llions visitors were made to Australia. while, it was a one fold of 1985 year. After ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moving
... was jumped to about 31 millions. moving towards table, minimum visitors came fr...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...Australia to 2.9 millions in 1975 year. while, in the last year, most or the people v...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64243276586 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9183245849 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239266322578 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109045627141 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085193780626 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167960023358 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093154240175 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.