TPO 42
The reading discusses that plenty of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows. Hence, the author listed three solutions to prevent this problem. However, the narrator of the lecture finds all the solutions dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author points out that by replacing the regular, clear glass with one-way glass they can solve this problem. Because, this glass is transparent only in one direction. In contrast, the professor states that this glass reflects the light like a mirror and the birds do not have any comprehension about the mirror so due to the fact that the picture of the sky is displayed in it, they go through the glass.
Furthermore, the author mentioned that colorful design probably prevents this problem. In fact, by showing the colorful lines and other designs on regular windows glass the risk of collision of birds deceased. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that these designs conclude opening, as a result, the birds try to fly through it. In conclusion, if they make these holes small, the inside of the building will become dark for people who are working there and if they are big, the birds go through it.
Last but not least, the reading passage proposes another solution could be creating ab artificial magnetic field. On the contrary, in direct contradiction to the reading passage, the lecturer claims that it is true that birds use magnetic earth but they do not do it in this condition. He provides examples to clarify it more. When birds migrate from a cold country to the warm, they use magnetic earth to find their ways for navigation. While for short distance, like going from one part of the city to other parts they use eyes and brightness of the light.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...-way glass they can solve this problem. Because, this glass is transparent only in one ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78274760383 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37536444689 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555910543131 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9520130501 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495929044946 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152827222018 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895233978115 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28043318911 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545774410575 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.