“Some people thinh that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are play in teams, like football, while other people thinh that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion”
it is argued that playing team sport provides people with more benefits and wonderful experience. I have to admit that this perspective is accurate to a somewhat extent, I still hold a notion that playing individual sport is much more advantageous.
On the one hand, there are myriad obvious benefits of team sports such as football, basketball or volleyball. First of all, these provides golden opportunities for players developing theirs soft skills like teamwork and communication skills which not only help players in their daily social interaction but also lead in tranquil with co-workers. Second, team sports bring people the chance to improve a sence of unity, friendship and sportsmanship between teammates. In particular, entering competition together makes players closer and brings unforgettable experiences in life.
On the other hand, others who are in favours of playing individual sports like tennis, swimming or badminton have their own justifications. As a matter of fact, individual practices make people feel more competition and motivation. this is to say, many people feel exciting and interesting when they cope with their opponent and deal their problems independently. Apart from this, individual sports give them more opportunities to enhance their personal skills such as being able to manage emotions, face with pressures and build confidence. To specify, taking part in individual sports provide player chance in order to challenge themselves by setting goals and achieving personal best. Last but not least, individual sports are suitable for hectic schedule people who no longer need to spend time and effort for gathering other or introvert person.
To recapitulate, I am strongly convinced that despite the grate benefits of playing team sport, player ought to attend individual sport. Simultaneously, it would be more prudent for them to combine both types in order to attain the best results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-05 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 84 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in UK in 2002 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to a ract more local people to visit these places 67
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 83
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to scotland who visited four different attraction from 1980 to 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that playing team sport provi...
^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('somewhat') instead an adjective, or a noun ('extent') instead of another adjective.
...it that this perspective is accurate to a somewhat extent, I still hold a notion that playing ind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e feel more competition and motivation. this is to say, many people feel exciting an...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in order to attain the best results.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, apart from, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4983277592 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94407479955 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2584965412 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29407157144 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10277908808 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587313817333 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175168031423 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055992293661 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.