TPO3 Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The author of the reading feels that this painting was not made by the Rembrandt. The lecture, however, challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that the author opinion's are fallacy.
To begin with, the author argues that the painting can not be made by the Rembrandt because there is a inconsistent way about the woman in the portrait is dressed. The article mention that the woman is wearing a luxurious fur collar, but the Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details, would not have been guity of such inconsistency. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She argues that this luxurious fur collar was not there since the beginning, someone painted this fur collar to increase the value of the painting. Moreover, she says that the painting was modificaded 100 years ago.
Secondly, the writter suggest that the face of the woman appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. In adition, the author said that the master of light and shadow, Rembrant, would never have made this kind of mistake. The lecture, in the other hand, oposes this by mentioning that the original painting was a collar that iluminated this painting. Furthermore, in the beggining of the lecture she said that the painting was analyzed by a Scientific Departament that comproved the bond between the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet and the Remrandt.
Finally, the author posists that the Rembrandt often painted on wood panels and there are no paintings known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood, for this reason the author belives that this painting was not made by Rembrandt. In contrast, the lecture's position is that the original painting was made with wood, but someone stuck severals panels of wood to increase the size of painting.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 73
- TPO28 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
- TPO9 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of p 3
- TPO 2 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 78
- TPO12 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...painting was not made by the Rembrandt. The lecture, however, challenges the claims...
^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... made by the Rembrandt because there is a inconsistent way about the woman in the...
^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mistake. The lecture, in the other hand, oposes this by mentioning that the origi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83582089552 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52722489534 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435820895522 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7940665976 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972647139218 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455949861825 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407409169808 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759327488249 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349580227015 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.