The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen
Movie Production Company.
“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer
people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the
percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies
actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not
reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of
our movies but with the public’s lack of awareness that movies of good quality are
available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to
reaching the public through advertising.”
The memo makes a number of unwarranted statements, which if holds true could make the argument invalid.
The production company claims that fewer people attended their movies and yet they got higher percentage of positive reviews. The passage does not mention what type of movies they make. Are they romantic,comedy, or thriller? It could be that the type of movies they make are getting better but the audiences of those movies are decreasing. For example: Super screen producers make romantic comedy movies and they are getting better by the year but the number of people those who watch this kind of movie are decreasing. Hence, they should properly asses this before moving forward.
Furthermore, they state contents of the reviews are not reaching enough viewers. how are they certain that this is the case? Maybe it reaches the people but they are still not interested in the movie they make. For example: If a historical movie, no matter how great it is, how many good reviews it gets, if one does not like historical movies then he will not watch it,Period. There is no mention in the passage that the good reviews does not reach enough people or that they make movies that more people will watch. Before allocating greater budget for advertising, they should ask themselves "Are we making the films people really watch?"
The passage made a lot of unstated assumption, which if not answered, might tear the argument apart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Tanvi Sanandiya | 55 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The memo makes a number of unwarranted s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...number of unwarranted statements, which if holds true could make the argument inva...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... true could make the argument invalid. The production company claims...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... higher percentage of positive reviews. The passage does not mention what type of m...
^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , comedy
...e of movies they make. Are they romantic,comedy, or thriller? It could be that the type...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erly asses this before moving forward. Furthermore, they state con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...eviews are not reaching enough viewers. how are they certain that this is the case?...
^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Period
...torical movies then he will not watch it,Period. There is no mention in the passage tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the films people really watch?' The passage made a lot of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ade a lot of unstated assumption, which if not answered, might tear the argument a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, still, then, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 55.5748502994 27% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 2260.96107784 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 242.0 441.139720559 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9958677686 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49652788052 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 705.55239521 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.3263652675 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.70786347227 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136358846522 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565898889416 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637431114733 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665085712265 0.128457276422 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711957578094 0.0628817314937 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 98.500998004 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.