People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Nowadays more and more people have insufficient knowledge about the essence of natural habitats. This unfortunate tendency resulted from a variety of reasons and some actions should be taken to improving the situation
On the one hand, there are several explanations of limited insight into the natural world. First and foremost, the dense curriculum is attributed to the lack of experience in the natural environment. There seem to be shreds of evidence that the contemporary syllabus is overfocusing on academic knowledge and neglecting the ecosystem's understanding. This is shown by pupils these days do not have time to discover wildlife as they strove to learn to pass the exams. In the second place, most people are living in artificial habitats and consequently, there is hardly a chance to discover natural surroundings. For instance, numerous modern citizens reportedly found it unnecessary to learn more about the planet they are residing in. Last but not least, the general public is headless toward this topic. By the way of illustrations, most people prioritize concern about the problem directly related to their welfare which brings immediate effect on their daily life. Economic development, crime rates or healthcare, to mention but a few
Luckily, this situation can be relieving using some of the following solutions. The first answer is to raise awareness among the population. Modifying the curriculum by making environmental information a fundamental subject is a good case in point. Secondly, more social campaigns about the environment should be organized by the government. Public propaganda may an effective way to raise consciousness. Moreover, mass media such as television or the internet which is easily accessible may draw more inhabitant's attention and imprint the relevant knowledge in their mind.
To sum up, poor environment understanding is due to an excessive emphasis on scholastic knowledge, little chance to discover wildlife and disinterest in environmental problems. However, it can be improving by modifying the syllabus, organizing ecosystem-based campaign or using mass media as a means of propaganda
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic social and commercial perspectives What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might be the case Do you think this a positive or negative situation 67
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...re residing in. Last but not least, the general public is headless toward this topic. By the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
..., this situation can be relieving using some of the following solutions. The first answer i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...hich is easily accessible may draw more inhabitants attention and imprint the relevant know...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the relevant knowledge in their mind. To sum up, poor environment understandin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, by the way, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51818181818 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17207888949 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5589796425 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.117647059 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252690570489 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636670811897 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770059802645 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140014368645 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845945619517 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...re residing in. Last but not least, the general public is headless toward this topic. By the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
..., this situation can be relieving using some of the following solutions. The first answer i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...hich is easily accessible may draw more inhabitants attention and imprint the relevant know...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the relevant knowledge in their mind. To sum up, poor environment understandin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, by the way, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51818181818 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17207888949 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5589796425 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.117647059 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252690570489 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636670811897 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770059802645 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140014368645 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845945619517 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.