some people think that children watching tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, several people supporting the idea that television should be used on a regular basis by children both in school and at home as TV is a much more efficient way to learn. From my perspective, it is irrefutable that watching television may have some beneficial impacts on the development of a child, the screen-time should be restricted for the children's own sake
On the one hand, there are several benefits of watching television that is worth mentioning. First and foremost, watching tv can be a great means of achieving knowledge without feeling bored or stressed. It is undeniable that numerous programmes on television that contain entertainment as well as educational values. The science-related programs which conduct various exciting experience that children can straightforwardly reconduct a similar one, probably a suitable case in point. Another plus point of watching television is due to its convenience and time-saving. It can be said that by acquiring academic knowledge through distant learning programs on tv, children are able to save plenty of precious hours wasted on commuting or moving from class to class
Nevertheless, the restriction of television usage is necessary as excessive usage of TV is detrimental to the comprehensive development of youngsters. The fundamental reason that needs address is that watching television in school as well as at private accommodation is harmful to the child's well-being. By the way of illustration, children may suffer from eye strain and back pain as a result of being physical inactivity for quite a long time. Furthermore, this sedentary activity even takes responsibility for obesity and numerous cardiovascular diseases in the long term. Besides the health risk, being attached to the electronic screen is synonymous with children will spend a significantly lower time to communicate with the surrounding people face to face, which may degrade their communication ability as well as other cognitive skills including creativity or imagination, to mention but a few
To sum up, watching television may have the advantage of being an effective means of acquiring knowledge as well as saving commuting time, but it also detrimental to health as well as degenerate some cognitive skills such as communication if being overused
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-18 | longpm2k | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-27 | thiên định | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | phanduydat | 82 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | BUITUYET | 86 | view |
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- what are the causes and effects of traffic congestions? 78
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life 89
- There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.Write your composition. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, by the way, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40555555556 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28976621181 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 140.849547537 49.4020404114 285% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.909090909 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7272727273 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245686835786 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938519950503 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821284652648 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162746352735 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997150821489 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.