The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.
The flowchart illustrates the process of manufacturing that how to produce consumer products through the several steps including feedback system which can send information to the previous stages for enabling the adjustments.
Overall, it can be seen that the process by which goods are produced from raw materials and manufacturing components is a multistep, cylindrical process which consists of 11 stages.
Firstly, raw materials and manufacturing components are sent to a storage. At another step, after researching the product, it is sent for the design. The product design and storing materials are moved to the next stage for production planning. If the production planning is done, it is moved for assembling and sent a feedback to the storage for adjustment. After assembling the product, it is passed in the next stage for inspection, and then go for testing, then it sends a feedback to the design. After that the testing product is moved for packaging and it is sent to the dispatch. When it is ready for the sale, an information feedback goes to the market research. If it has any fault, it sends another feedback to the production planning. Finally, after researching the market, if the product is successfully done, it sends a feedback for the advertising, or if it is not appropriate, it sends another feedback to the packaging and the designing section.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | salik111 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | Shahidul Islam | 67 | view |
| 2017-01-23 | Stephanie Kaushal | 59 | view |
- The line graph shows immigration to USA Canada and Australia from 1990 to 2010 74
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012 86
- The two diagrams are the maps of a library The first is of the library in 1990 and the seconds is of how it looks at present in 2017 87
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12444444444 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03209498532 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.07073170732 747% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2667460879 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.818181818 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133393774924 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585247366941 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827003914897 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159186699774 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952972883523 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.