The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.

The given diagram depicts various typical modes of manufacturing good including the fist stage of enabling follows up by the whole process from where the information is given by consumer.

Overall, it is clear that the flow of information started with adding raw materials and manufactured components to storage. However, the flow of getting feedback from information is carried through design. Morever, advanced checking of the product can be seen during market research.

To begin with, storage takes the manufactured components and raw materials and then moved to production planning where the feedback is given to the storage. Further on, from production planning good have been transferred for assembling, inspection and testing. During testing of product, feeback was processed for design and then simultaneously it moved for packaging then dispatch of the product take place. Finally, sales is done while passing on review to the production planning department.

On the other hand, product understanding is done and designing take place which then goes under producting planning and follow basic step to undergo like assembling, inspection, testing, packaging, dispatch and sales. However, a major transfer of review giving during sale of product, one to the production planner and other to the market researcher, over there feeback is giving in three forms that is to the advertising and packing department and also for design team.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-31 salik111 84 view
2020-02-17 Shahidul Islam 67 view
2017-01-23 Stephanie Kaushal 59 view
Essays by user salik111 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, so, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51121076233 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85773041017 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.481823214 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.9 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121867792393 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529950878622 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891260486513 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106022499232 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120804105511 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.