The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children's sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The first line graph illustrates the spending on kids' sports per month (in pounds) and the second line graph compares how many British children who joined three sports (football, athletics, and swimming) over 6 years from 2008.
Overall, the average money spent on sports and the children numbers in 3 kinds of physical activities show upward trends over the period shown. It is noticeable that football was chosen the most from 2008 to 2014.
In the year 2008, 20 pounds was spent on the activities of kids monthly. During the same year, 8 million participants joined football, while the figures for swimming and athletics were significantly lower, 2 million and only hundreds, respectively. Two years later, the number of children who participated in athletics remained unchanged before reaching its peak at 5 million in 2012.
By 2014, expenditure on sports had climbed by about 10 pounds per month. As a result, 3 sports surveyed experienced a rise in their participant numbers. The respective figures for football and swimming had increased gradually to nearly 10 million and around 4 million. Remarkably, approximately 5 million kids signed up for athletics at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat poultry consumption 11
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- The graph below shows the changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 77
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12886597938 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8239943701 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1223981499 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284186864125 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106134226053 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083225335689 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178217774063 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682428666575 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.