The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the energy consumption for 6 different purposes in an average house in Australia and the percentages of greenhouse gases released from this energy use.
Overall, the proportion of power consumed for heating is higher than the other purposes but it produces a low amount of harmful emissions. It is clear that the two figures for cooling are the lowest.
In the surveyed household, 42% of the energy is used for heating, followed by water heating with 30%. However, the percentage of greenhouse gases emitted from heating is only 15%, while the figure for water heating is the highest among the surveyed ways of using power, 32%.
Turning to the other purposes, other appliances sector accounts for a mere 15% of the power used in the house but releases 28% of the gas amount, which is the second highest figure in the second chart. Similarly, the proportions of energy used for refrigeration and lighting are significantly low, 7% and 4%, respectively, but the amounts of resulted gases are doubled for each. Finally, cooling makes up only 2% of the power consumed and 3% of the gas emissions.
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
- In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and give 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
.... Turning to the other purposes, other appliances sector accounts for a mere 15% of the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88481675393 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67418851806 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1319800133 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218672223471 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998560714201 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086227367721 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146127866559 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102720281609 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.