It is more important for teachers to connect with students than to be experts in their fields
Educations have been discussed what is the best way to teach students, and one of important factors are instructors. Which is more important between connection with students or knowing more professional knowledge in their fields. Some people think that a teacher’s ability to bond with students is vital. However, the most significant consideration with regard to teachers is whether they have a profound understanding of the subject they teach because the main duty of a teacher is to provide students with an education, and teachers who do not have sufficient knowledge are not viewed as authority figures by their students.
First of all, the primary role of a teacher is to educate students, teachers who know a lot about a subject are able to quip their students with knowledge, which means that they have a much a greater impact on their students’ future success. Let me bring my personal story as an example, the teacher who influenced me the most was my math teacher in high school. Even though I did not have many opportunities to build a personal relationship with him, I learned more in his class than I did in any other. Because he knew so much about the information that was not included in the textbook. Thanks to him, I realized I had a talent for math and decided to pursue a career in engineering. If I had not learned the general subject at that time, I could not have my current career.
Second, teachers who lack knowledge don’t have authority in their classrooms. If a teacher’s understanding of the subject is limited, the students in the class will question his or her ability and will not show respect. For instance, my sixth grade teacher could not answer the students’ questions well and often made mistakes when explaining difficult concepts. The students often ridiculed him for this and refused to follow his instructions. If he had demonstrated that he had a lot of knowledge, we would have been much more respectful towards him.
In conclusion, the principal function of a teacher is to provide information to students, and teachers need to show that they fully comprehend the subject being taught to maintain control of the classroom. In this regard, I believe that having extensive knowledge is more important for teachers than being able to interact well with students.
- Nowadays students do many things like surfing the internet listening to music when they are learning Do you agree or disagree that doing other things has s bad effect on learning 73
- People spend too much money on their pets even though there can be other good ways to spend money Give details and examples to support your response 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 73
- pet 90
- University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e in his class than I did in any other. Because he knew so much about the information t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93094629156 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87322368462 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480818414322 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6723881316 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369329576881 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120025910782 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999948975597 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242865105255 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623601386891 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.