fuel-cell engine
According to the reading, "Car manufactures and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. One of the alternative engines is a fuel-cell engine. The author in the reading said that the fuel-cell engines have a lot of benefits. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First of all, the professor in the listening contends that the hydrogen-based engine is not available. the reading said, "hydrogen can be derived from various plentiful sources. However, for using hydrogen as the engine source, people have to make it a liquid state. It required a very low temperature. Then, the liquid element is hard to be made and stored. This casts doubt on the reading's claim that the fuel-cell engine will be useful since the resource of the past engine will be extinct, but the fuel-cell one's material is easy to get.
Second, the professor in the listening argues that the fuel-cell engine cannot resolve the environmental problems. the reading said that the past products create CO2 that is harmful to the environment, and the byproduct of fuel-cell one is water. However, for producing pure hydrogen, people have to spend a lot of energy, and it is usually made of oil and coal. This counters the reading passage's claim that the hydrogen-based engine is helpful for solving pollution problems owing to its basic resource, water.
Lastly, the professor in the listening insists that the fuel-cell is not economically helpful. The listening said, "a fuel-cell automobile is nearly twice as efficient in using than the past one. However, the hydrogen-based engine requires some material for connecting to electricity. the item is very expensive. This refutes the reading passage's claim that the fuel-cell is less costly due to its efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | negooo | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | 1ms19ec133 | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | jimHsu | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | dnudlyjgtnudbphwev | 73 | view |
- It is better to make friends who are intelligent than with a good sense of humor 76
- When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team it has negative effects on their lives 73
- People spend too much money on their pets even though there can be other good ways to spend money Give details and examples to support your response 65
- It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 73
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on young people s behavior 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ydrogen-based engine is not available. the reading said, 'hydrogen can be der...
^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...gine will be extinct, but the fuel-cell ones material is easy to get. Second, th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...not resolve the environmental problems. the reading said that the past products cre...
^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...material for connecting to electricity. the item is very expensive. This refutes th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26402640264 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99655427745 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488448844884 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7286813531 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9473684211 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478617899301 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1672979991 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181267143146 0.0662205650399 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348591833636 0.162205337803 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365341951557 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ydrogen-based engine is not available. the reading said, 'hydrogen can be der...
^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...gine will be extinct, but the fuel-cell ones material is easy to get. Second, th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...not resolve the environmental problems. the reading said that the past products cre...
^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...material for connecting to electricity. the item is very expensive. This refutes th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26402640264 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99655427745 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488448844884 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7286813531 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9473684211 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478617899301 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1672979991 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181267143146 0.0662205650399 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348591833636 0.162205337803 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365341951557 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.